Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSIX
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$14.79
Change-$0.83 (-5.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.91M
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSIX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSIX (32.9M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). RLSIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). RLSIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSAX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. RLSIX (1.51). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. RLSIX (-21.54).
| NLSAX | RLSIX | NLSAX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.609 | -4.334 | 14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.9M | 24,809% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 1.51 | 227% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.30 | 49.54 | 51% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.35 | -21.54 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | 56.26 | 116% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement