Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSIX
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSIX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Instl
Price$15.53
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.65M
NLSAX vs RLSIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSIX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. RLSIX (35.7M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSIX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSIX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSIX (14 years). RLSIX (1.89) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSIX (10.00). NLSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLSIX: NLSAX (1000) vs RLSIX (50000). NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. RLSIX (6.08). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.78 vs. RLSIX (-10.85).
| NLSAX | RLSIX | NLSAX / RLSIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.85 | 91% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 1.89 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.259 | 9.059 | 80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 50000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 35.7M | 22,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 6.08 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 69.54 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.78 | -10.85 | -182% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.79 | 47.40 | 120% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement