Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.60
Change-$0.04 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.16B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.47
Change-$0.82 (-5.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.08M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8.16B vs. RLSFX (32.1M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). RLSFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. NLSAX (0.96). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.43 vs. RLSFX (1.33). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.35 vs. RLSFX (-22.29).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.609 | -4.425 | 14% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.16B | 32.1M | 25,427% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.43 | 1.33 | 258% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.30 | 48.87 | 52% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.35 | -22.29 | -87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.99 | 52.89 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers