Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.55
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.6B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$14.76
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.52M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.6B vs. RLSFX (36.5M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSFX (13 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. NLSAX (8.97). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 24.38 vs. RLSFX (-3.72).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.905 | 5.731 | 103% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.6B | 36.5M | 20,825% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.97 | 12.33 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.89 | 44.99 | 33% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.38 | -3.72 | -656% |
| Returns for 10 years | 49.76 | 36.56 | 136% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement