Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.74
Change+$0.02 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.96B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.24
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.75M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Hold and RLSFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 7.96B vs. RLSFX (34.8M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLSFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.65 vs. NLSAX (6.02). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 21.23 vs. RLSFX (-15.10).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.934 | 9.169 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.96B | 34.8M | 22,879% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.02 | 6.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.66 | 85.40 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.23 | -15.10 | -141% |
| Returns for 10 years | 57.45 | 47.15 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement