Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLSAX vs RLSFX
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison
Open Charts NLSAX vs RLSFX
Neuberger Berman Long Short A
Price$19.80
Change-$0.01 (-0.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.99B
RiverPark Long/Short Opportunity Retail
Price$15.21
Change+$0.02 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets35.65M
NLSAX vs RLSFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLSAX vs. RLSFX commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLSAX is a Buy and RLSFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLSAX has more cash in the bank: 8B vs. RLSFX (35.7M). NLSAX (0.00) and RLSFX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLSAX was incepted earlier than RLSFX: NLSAX (14 years) vs RLSFX (14 years). RLSFX (2.17) is less costly to investors than NLSAX (1.68). NLSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 48.00 vs. RLSFX (10.00). NLSAX (1000) and RLSFX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NLSAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.74 vs. RLSFX (5.92). NLSAX return over 5 years is better than : 19.78 vs. RLSFX (-11.62).
| NLSAX | RLSFX | NLSAX / RLSFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.00 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 2.17 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.259 | 8.954 | 81% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8B | 35.7M | 22,395% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.74 | 5.92 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 19.70 | 68.81 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.78 | -11.62 | -170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 56.79 | 44.26 | 128% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers