Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLR vs PAWZ
NLR vs PAWZ Comparison
Open Charts NLR vs PAWZ
VanEck Uranium & Nuclear ETF
Price$114.74
Change-$2.39 (-2.04%)
Volume$555.58K
Net Assets1.99B
ProShares Pet Care ETF
Price$56.51
Change-$0.56 (-0.98%)
Volume$12.72K
Net Assets60.02M
NLR vs PAWZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLR vs. PAWZ commentary
Jul 22, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLR is a Buy and PAWZ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLR has more net assets: 1.99B vs. PAWZ (60M). NLR has a higher annual dividend yield than PAWZ: NLR (41.062) vs PAWZ (4.363). NLR was incepted earlier than PAWZ: NLR (18 years) vs PAWZ (7 years). PAWZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than NLR (0.56). PAWZ has a higher turnover NLR (36.00) vs NLR (36.00).
| NLR | PAWZ | NLR / PAWZ | |
| Gain YTD | 41.062 | 4.363 | 941% |
| Net Assets | 1.99B | 60M | 3,315% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.50 | 112% |
| Turnover | 36.00 | 72.00 | 50% |
| Yield | 0.56 | 0.81 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NLR | PAWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLR has been closely correlated with NXE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NLR jumps, then NXE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NLR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NLR | 100% | -2.04% | ||
| NXE - NLR | 86% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| DNN - NLR | 77% Closely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| SMR - NLR | 77% Closely correlated | -9.57% | ||
| OKLO - NLR | 75% Closely correlated | -9.38% | ||
| BWXT - NLR | 74% Closely correlated | -1.81% | ||
More | ||||
PAWZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAWZ has been loosely correlated with CHWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAWZ jumps, then CHWY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAWZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAWZ | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| CHWY - PAWZ | 55% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| ELAN - PAWZ | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| TSCO - PAWZ | 42% Loosely correlated | +1.47% | ||
| ODC - PAWZ | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.64% | ||
| ZTS - PAWZ | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
More | ||||