NLPXF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
8.96M
OMZNF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
48.97M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLPXF vs OMZNF

Header iconNLPXF vs OMZNF Comparison
Open Charts NLPXF vs OMZNFBanner chart's image
Noble Mineral Exploration
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$32.5K
Capitalization8.96M
Osisko Metals
Price$0.31
Change-$0.01 (-3.12%)
Volume$10.4K
Capitalization48.97M
NLPXF vs OMZNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLPXF vs. OMZNF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLPXF is a Hold and OMZNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NLPXF: $0.03 vs. OMZNF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: NLPXF and OMZNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLPXF: 76% vs. OMZNF: 71%
Market capitalization -- NLPXF: $8.96M vs. OMZNF: $48.97M
NLPXF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $8.96M. OMZNF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $48.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLPXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOMZNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NLPXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OMZNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMZNF is a better buy in the long-term than NLPXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLPXF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMZNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLPXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMZNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, OMZNF is a better buy in the short-term than NLPXF.

Price Growth

NLPXF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.37% price change this week, while OMZNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.40% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OMZNF($49M) has a higher market cap than NLPXF($8.96M). NLPXF YTD gains are higher at: 41.967 vs. OMZNF (28.612). NLPXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.72M vs. OMZNF (-14.75M). NLPXF has more cash in the bank: 6.33M vs. OMZNF (1.92M). NLPXF has less debt than OMZNF: NLPXF (57K) vs OMZNF (13M). NLPXF (0) and OMZNF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NLPXFOMZNFNLPXF / OMZNF
Capitalization8.96M49M18%
EBITDA-1.72M-14.75M12%
Gain YTD41.96728.612147%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.33M1.92M330%
Total Debt57K13M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NLPXF vs OMZNF: Fundamental Ratings
NLPXF
OMZNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9291
SMR RATING
1..100
9393
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
435
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3750

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMZNF's Valuation (49) in the null industry is in the same range as NLPXF (76). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to NLPXF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as NLPXF (92). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to NLPXF’s over the last 12 months.

OMZNF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as NLPXF (93). This means that OMZNF’s stock grew similarly to NLPXF’s over the last 12 months.

NLPXF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (42). This means that NLPXF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

NLPXF's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as OMZNF (35). This means that NLPXF’s stock grew similarly to OMZNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLPXFOMZNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLPXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
OMZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BGOUF2.170.11
+5.34%
Bang & Olufsen AS
CLCMF2.87N/A
N/A
Sinch AB
GBCS2.25N/A
N/A
Selectis Health,Inc.
KARX0.98N/A
N/A
Karbon-X Corp.
IMCDY67.55-0.52
-0.76%
IMCD Group NV

NLPXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NLPXF and NWXPF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NLPXF and NWXPF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLPXF
1D Price
Change %
NLPXF100%
N/A
NWXPF - NLPXF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NB - NLPXF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.99%
NTCPF - NLPXF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.18%
NMREF - NLPXF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OMZNF - NLPXF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
More

OMZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that OMZNF and PGEZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OMZNF and PGEZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMZNF
1D Price
Change %
OMZNF100%
-2.28%
PGEZF - OMZNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
CXOXF - OMZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WLBMF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.00%
SLVDF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
SMDZF - OMZNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More