NLIBF
Price
$0.20
Change
-$0.08 (-28.57%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
39.06M
SCCFF
Price
$0.31
Change
-$0.10 (-24.39%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
18.14M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLIBF vs SCCFF

Header iconNLIBF vs SCCFF Comparison
Open Charts NLIBF vs SCCFFBanner chart's image
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.20
Change-$0.08 (-28.57%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization39.06M
Strategic Resources
Price$0.31
Change-$0.10 (-24.39%)
Volume$180
Capitalization18.14M
NLIBF vs SCCFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLIBF vs. SCCFF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLIBF is a Hold and SCCFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NLIBF: $0.20 vs. SCCFF: $0.31)
Brand notoriety: NLIBF and SCCFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLIBF: 30% vs. SCCFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- NLIBF: $39.06M vs. SCCFF: $18.14M
NLIBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $39.06M. SCCFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $18.14M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLIBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSCCFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SCCFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SCCFF is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLIBF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SCCFF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SCCFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NLIBF is a better buy in the short-term than SCCFF.

Price Growth

NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -23.08% price change this week, while SCCFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.36%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.41% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($39.1M) has a higher market cap than SCCFF($18.1M). NLIBF YTD gains are higher at: 11.111 vs. SCCFF (-32.805).
NLIBFSCCFFNLIBF / SCCFF
Capitalization39.1M18.1M216%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.111-32.805-34%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash3.88MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SCCFF: Fundamental Ratings
SCCFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
96
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLIBFSCCFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
57%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
54%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
23%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
17%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SCCFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMPYF0.48N/A
+0.01%
Empress Royalty Corp.
RTOXF3.95N/A
N/A
Rotork PLC
YZCHF1.00N/A
N/A
YANKUANG ENERGY GROUP CO LTD.
OISXF7.47N/A
N/A
OISIX RA Daichi Inc.
MSSUF10.05N/A
N/A
Metal Sky Star Acquisition Corporation

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QZMRF - NLIBF
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
FXRVF - NLIBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.52%
GOLXF - NLIBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SCCFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCCFF has been loosely correlated with FXRVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCCFF jumps, then FXRVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SCCFF
1D Price
Change %
SCCFF100%
N/A
FXRVF - SCCFF
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NLIBF - SCCFF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
UAMY - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+4.23%
LUCMF - SCCFF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
RTNTF - SCCFF
7%
Poorly correlated
+3.13%
More