NLIBF
Price
$0.21
Change
-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Updated
Sep 10 closing price
Capitalization
62.55M
QZMRF
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.05 (-8.33%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
38.17M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NLIBF vs QZMRF

Header iconNLIBF vs QZMRF Comparison
Open Charts NLIBF vs QZMRFBanner chart's image
NOA LITHIUM BRINES
Price$0.21
Change-$0.04 (-15.38%)
Volume$18K
Capitalization62.55M
Quartz Mountain Resources
Price$0.55
Change-$0.05 (-8.33%)
Volume$7.3K
Capitalization38.17M
NLIBF vs QZMRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NLIBF vs. QZMRF commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLIBF is a Hold and QZMRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NLIBF: $0.22 vs. QZMRF: $0.55)
Brand notoriety: NLIBF and QZMRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NLIBF: 190% vs. QZMRF: 38%
Market capitalization -- NLIBF: $62.55M vs. QZMRF: $38.17M
NLIBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $62.55M. QZMRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $38.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NLIBF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQZMRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NLIBF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QZMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QZMRF is a better buy in the long-term than NLIBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NLIBF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QZMRF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NLIBF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • QZMRF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QZMRF is a better buy in the short-term than NLIBF.

Price Growth

NLIBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QZMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -18.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +6.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +50.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +116.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+6.26% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NLIBF($62.5M) has a higher market cap than QZMRF($38.2M). QZMRF YTD gains are higher at: 162.905 vs. NLIBF (19.444). QZMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.98M vs. NLIBF (-19.63M). QZMRF has more cash in the bank: 4.15M vs. NLIBF (3.33M). NLIBF has less debt than QZMRF: NLIBF (2.03K) vs QZMRF (13.4K). NLIBF (0) and QZMRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NLIBFQZMRFNLIBF / QZMRF
Capitalization62.5M38.2M164%
EBITDA-19.63M-3.98M493%
Gain YTD19.444162.90512%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.33M4.15M80%
Total Debt2.03K13.4K15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QZMRF: Fundamental Ratings
QZMRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
52
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NLIBFQZMRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NLIBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSMMY30.060.37
+1.23%
Persimmon Plc
EJPRY12.420.10
+0.81%
East Japan Railway Co.
CSNRF3.46N/A
N/A
Chesnara Plc.
GLAI0.45N/A
N/A
Global AI Inc.
PMHS0.20N/A
N/A
Polomar Health Services, Inc.

NLIBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NLIBF has been loosely correlated with SCCFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NLIBF jumps, then SCCFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NLIBF
1D Price
Change %
NLIBF100%
N/A
SCCFF - NLIBF
45%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QZMRF - NLIBF
31%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
FXRVF - NLIBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMMYY - NLIBF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
GOLXF - NLIBF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
More

QZMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QZMRF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QZMRF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QZMRF
1D Price
Change %
QZMRF100%
-8.01%
NLIBF - QZMRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - QZMRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNOMF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNPNF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.76%
RKMSF - QZMRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More