Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGEBX
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$28.79
Change-$0.40 (-1.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets839.43M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$77.85
Change-$0.83 (-1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (839M). NLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.78 vs. NLCCX (-8.09). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 17.07 vs. NLCCX (-24.88).
| NLCCX | RGEBX | NLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.08 | 152% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.08 | 152% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.460 | 2.635 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 839M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 9.78 | -83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.31 | 55.10 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.88 | 17.07 | -146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.13 | 114.13 | 15% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement