Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGEBX
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$83.95
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
NLCCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (836M). NLCCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX (11.27) and RGEBX (10.77) have marching annual gain over last year. RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.57 vs. NLCCX (-14.65).
| NLCCX | RGEBX | NLCCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.09 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 1.09 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.449 | 17.511 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 10.77 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.61 | 69.56 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.65 | 36.57 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 92.27 | 28% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement