Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAHX
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAHX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.19
Change-$0.07 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.63M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$81.34
Change-$0.24 (-0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (842M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAHX (0.43) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NLCCX (29 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.85 vs. NLCCX (-8.09). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 21.41 vs. NLCCX (-24.88).
| NLCCX | RGAHX | NLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.460 | 2.650 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 842M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.43 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.09 | 10.85 | -75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 50.31 | 59.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.88 | 21.41 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.13 | 123.81 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement