Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAHX
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAHX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.46
Change-$0.86 (-2.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets858.79M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.13
Change-$1.92 (-2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NLCCX (859M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX (9.19) and RGAHX (9.02) have marching annual gain over last year. RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.79 vs. NLCCX (-12.70).
| NLCCX | RGAHX | NLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 16.153 | 19.894 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 859M | 340B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.19 | 9.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.66 | 65.43 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.70 | 40.79 | -31% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement