Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGAHX
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGAHX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.22
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets840.92M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$80.14
Change+$0.24 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NLCCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NLCCX (841M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGAHX (0.44) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGAHX (32.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGAHX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.75 vs. NLCCX (-12.54). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 23.10 vs. NLCCX (-24.69).
| NLCCX | RGAHX | NLCCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.44 | 373% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.057 | 9.123 | -99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 841M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.44 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.54 | 5.75 | -218% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | 65.91 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.69 | 23.10 | -107% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.80 | 96.48 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement