Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$29.22
Change+$0.06 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets840.92M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$78.34
Change+$0.23 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Dec 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Hold and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. NLCCX (841M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.93). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (32.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.45 vs. NLCCX (-12.54). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 20.43 vs. NLCCX (-24.69).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.93 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.057 | 8.821 | -103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 841M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.54 | 5.45 | -230% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.85 | 63.36 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.69 | 20.43 | -121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.80 | 92.34 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement