Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$34.87
Change-$0.09 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NLCCX (835M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. NLCCX (15.43). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NLCCX (-15.55).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.528 | 15.516 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.43 | 17.83 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.80 | 58.53 | 46% |
| Returns for 5 years | -15.55 | 40.02 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.14 | 95.93 | 25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement