Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$34.93
Change-$0.13 (-0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets838.54M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NLCCX (839M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NLCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 51.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.08 vs. NLCCX (12.60). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. NLCCX (-14.49).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 0.94 | 169% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.715 | 14.044 | 62% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 839M | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.60 | 14.08 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.15 | 41.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.49 | 41.95 | -35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.94 | 83.68 | 20% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement