Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCCX vs RGACX
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCCX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth C
Price$36.13
Change+$0.12 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets836.47M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.70
Change+$0.17 (+0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
NLCCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCCX vs. RGACX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCCX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCCX (836M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCCX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCCX (0.00). NLCCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCCX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NLCCX (1.64) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NLCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCCX: RGACX (250) vs NLCCX (1000). NLCCX (11.27) and RGACX (11.01) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 37.85 vs. NLCCX (-14.65).
| NLCCX | RGACX | NLCCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.94 | 174% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.449 | 17.655 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 836M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 11.01 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.61 | 70.57 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | -14.65 | 37.85 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.71 | 96.78 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement