Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGEBX
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGEBX
Voya Large-Cap Growth A
Price$47.28
Change-$9.19 (-16.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets800.56M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$75.85
Change-$9.36 (-10.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets335.97B
NLCAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. NLCAX (801M). NLCAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NLCAX (29 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.08) is less costly to investors than NLCAX (0.89). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGEBX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.80 vs. NLCAX (-5.67). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 9.88 vs. NLCAX (-6.84).
| NLCAX | RGEBX | NLCAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.08 | 82% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.696 | -1.057 | 255% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 801M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.67 | 1.80 | -315% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.92 | 41.63 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.84 | 9.88 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.26 | 110.02 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers