Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NLCAX vs RGACX
NLCAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NLCAX vs RGACX
Voya Large-Cap Growth A
Price$53.60
Change-$0.13 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets835.19M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NLCAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NLCAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NLCAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NLCAX (835M). RGACX pays higher dividends than NLCAX: RGACX (0.07) vs NLCAX (0.00). NLCAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NLCAX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NLCAX (0.84). NLCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NLCAX: RGACX (250) vs NLCAX (1000). NLCAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.98 vs. RGACX (17.83). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NLCAX (6.43).
| NLCAX | RGACX | NLCAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.94 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.098 | 15.516 | 59% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.98 | 17.83 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.02 | 58.53 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.43 | 40.02 | 16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.52 | 95.93 | 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement