Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.66
Change-$0.10 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.12B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$65.35
Change-$0.27 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Hold and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NIQCX (1.12B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (0.85) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (13 years) vs RERFX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.45 vs. NIQCX (7.20). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 15.27 vs. NIQCX (5.29).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.186 | 21.785 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.12B | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.85 | 41% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 11.45 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.22 | 49.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | 15.27 | 35% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.09 | 44.43 | 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement