Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs RERFX
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs RERFX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.99
Change-$0.15 (-0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.1B
American Funds EUPAC R5
Price$66.15
Change-$0.43 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.15B
NIQCX vs RERFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. RERFX commentary
Dec 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a StrongBuy and RERFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERFX has more cash in the bank: 134B vs. NIQCX (1.1B). RERFX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: RERFX (0.84) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than RERFX: NIQCX (13 years) vs RERFX (24 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than RERFX (0.52). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RERFX (35.00). RERFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: RERFX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). RERFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. NIQCX (12.76). RERFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.08 vs. NIQCX (2.83).
| NIQCX | RERFX | NIQCX / RERFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.52 | 387% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.52 | 421% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.023 | 24.078 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.1B | 134B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.84 | 42% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.76 | 14.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.58 | 35.40 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.83 | 5.08 | 56% |
| Returns for 10 years | 43.90 | 53.55 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers