Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NIQCX vs REREX
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison
Open Charts NIQCX vs REREX
Neuberger Berman International Eq C
Price$14.66
Change-$0.10 (-0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.11B
American Funds EUPAC R4
Price$63.50
Change-$0.27 (-0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.72B
NIQCX vs REREX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NIQCX vs. REREX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIQCX is a Hold and REREX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
REREX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. NIQCX (1.11B). REREX pays higher dividends than NIQCX: REREX (0.68) vs NIQCX (0.35). NIQCX was incepted earlier than REREX: NIQCX (13 years) vs REREX (23 years). NIQCX (2.19) is less costly to investors than REREX (0.82). NIQCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. REREX (35.00). REREX has a lower initial minimum investment than NIQCX: REREX (250) vs NIQCX (1000). REREX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.93 vs. NIQCX (7.20). REREX return over 5 years is better than : 13.51 vs. NIQCX (5.29).
| NIQCX | REREX | NIQCX / REREX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.82 | 245% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.19 | 0.82 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.186 | 21.392 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.11B | 138B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.35 | 0.68 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.20 | 10.93 | 66% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.22 | 48.47 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.29 | 13.51 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.09 | 41.59 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement