It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NIPMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNSRGY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NSRGY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
NIPMY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NSRGY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -1.75% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.15%.
NSRGY is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
NIPMY | NSRGY | NIPMY / NSRGY | |
Capitalization | 2.99B | 328B | 1% |
EBITDA | 86.4B | 16.7B | 517% |
Gain YTD | 15.520 | -26.475 | -59% |
P/E Ratio | 19.92 | 29.33 | 68% |
Revenue | 1.24T | 95.5B | 1,297% |
Total Cash | 81.2B | 4.36B | 1,862% |
Total Debt | 237B | 59.6B | 398% |
NIPMY | NSRGY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 82 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NSRGY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (34). This means that NSRGY’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.
NSRGY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIPMY (100). This means that NSRGY’s stock grew similarly to NIPMY’s over the last 12 months.
NIPMY's SMR Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for NSRGY (100). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew significantly faster than NSRGY’s over the last 12 months.
NIPMY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as NSRGY (79). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to NSRGY’s over the last 12 months.
NIPMY's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as NSRGY (82). This means that NIPMY’s stock grew similarly to NSRGY’s over the last 12 months.
NSRGY | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago39% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago47% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago43% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago48% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago46% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago36% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago44% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago51% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that NIPMY and DANOY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIPMY and DANOY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NIPMY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NIPMY | 100% | N/A | ||
DANOY - NIPMY | 26% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
GPDNF - NIPMY | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
K - NIPMY | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
NSRGY - NIPMY | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
NSRGF - NIPMY | 17% Poorly correlated | -0.06% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NSRGY has been closely correlated with NSRGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NSRGY jumps, then NSRGF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NSRGY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NSRGY | 100% | +0.32% | ||
NSRGF - NSRGY | 88% Closely correlated | -0.06% | ||
DANOY - NSRGY | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.38% | ||
USNA - NSRGY | 28% Poorly correlated | -3.83% | ||
GPDNF - NSRGY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
NIPMY - NSRGY | 18% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |