NIOVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.77M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
TGMR
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 29 closing price
Capitalization
40.71K
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NIOVF vs TGMR

Header iconNIOVF vs TGMR Comparison
Open Charts NIOVF vs TGMRBanner chart's image
Plato Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27K
Capitalization5.77M
Troy Gold & Mineral
Price$0.07
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$300
Capitalization40.71K
NIOVF vs TGMR Comparison Chart in %
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIOVF vs. TGMR commentary
Oct 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOVF is a Hold and TGMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 16, 2025
Stock price -- (NIOVF: $0.02 vs. TGMR: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: NIOVF and TGMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIOVF: 93% vs. TGMR: 90%
Market capitalization -- NIOVF: $5.77M vs. TGMR: $40.71K
NIOVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $5.77M. TGMR’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $40.71K. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $109.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIOVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NIOVF and TGMR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NIOVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGMR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NIOVF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TGMR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGMR is a better buy in the short-term than NIOVF.

Price Growth

NIOVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -33.77% price change this week, while TGMR (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +19.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1771.35%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.75% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NIOVF($5.77M) has a higher market cap than TGMR($40.7K). TGMR YTD gains are higher at: 61.290 vs. NIOVF (19.048).
NIOVFTGMRNIOVF / TGMR
Capitalization5.77M40.7K14,170%
EBITDA-1.26MN/A-
Gain YTD19.04861.29031%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash341KN/A-
Total Debt1.27MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIOVF vs TGMR: Fundamental Ratings
NIOVF
TGMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
932
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGMR's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NIOVF (57). This means that TGMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (100). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

TGMR's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NIOVF (100). This means that TGMR’s stock grew similarly to NIOVF’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as TGMR (53). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

NIOVF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TGMR (100). This means that NIOVF’s stock grew similarly to TGMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIOVFTGMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
70%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NIOVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHOO34.960.64
+1.86%
Steven Madden Ltd
DECK99.280.97
+0.99%
Deckers Outdoor Corp
ADSE10.31-0.04
-0.39%
Ads-Tec Energy PLC
SLGL39.75-0.20
-0.50%
Sol-Gel Technologies Ltd
VIVS2.74-0.22
-7.43%
VivoSim Lab Inc

NIOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOVF and GPTRF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOVF and GPTRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOVF
1D Price
Change %
NIOVF100%
-18.37%
GPTRF - NIOVF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
KGLDF - NIOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
USAU - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.63%
GSTMF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.95%
AIRRF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.66%
More

TGMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TGMR has been loosely correlated with PZG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TGMR jumps, then PZG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGMR
1D Price
Change %
TGMR100%
N/A
PZG - TGMR
34%
Loosely correlated
-5.51%
RVTI - TGMR
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NIOVF - TGMR
15%
Poorly correlated
-18.37%
RDYFF - TGMR
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
GSISF - TGMR
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More