NIOVF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 9 closing price
SMPEF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 6 closing price
Ad is loading...

NIOVF vs SMPEF

Header iconNIOVF vs SMPEF Comparison
Open Charts NIOVF vs SMPEFBanner chart's image
Plato Gold
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
SOUTHERN EMPIRE RES
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125K
CapitalizationN/A
NIOVF vs SMPEF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIOVF vs. SMPEF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIOVF is a Hold and SMPEF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (NIOVF: $0.02 vs. SMPEF: $0.01)
Brand notoriety: NIOVF and SMPEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIOVF: 24% vs. SMPEF: 456%
Market capitalization -- NIOVF: $3.45M vs. SMPEF: $4.04M
NIOVF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.45M. SMPEF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIOVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMPEF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NIOVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SMPEF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NIOVF is a better buy in the long-term than SMPEF.

Price Growth

NIOVF (@Precious Metals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMPEF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.68% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMPEF($4.05M) has a higher market cap than NIOVF($3.45M). NIOVF YTD gains are higher at: 108.257 vs. SMPEF (-71.253). NIOVF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -224.89K vs. SMPEF (-826.79K). SMPEF has more cash in the bank: 1.17M vs. NIOVF (28.9K). NIOVF (0) and SMPEF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NIOVFSMPEFNIOVF / SMPEF
Capitalization3.45M4.05M85%
EBITDA-224.89K-826.79K27%
Gain YTD108.257-71.253-152%
P/E RatioN/A5.97-
Revenue00-
Total Cash28.9K1.17M2%
Total Debt34.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NIOVF: Fundamental Ratings
NIOVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
35
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
28

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

NIOVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIOVF and GRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIOVF and GRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIOVF
1D Price
Change %
NIOVF100%
N/A
GRLGF - NIOVF
28%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
AIRRF - NIOVF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GPTRF - NIOVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMPEF - NIOVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSTMF - NIOVF
21%
Poorly correlated
+51.72%
More

SMPEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMPEF and EOGSF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMPEF and EOGSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMPEF
1D Price
Change %
SMPEF100%
N/A
EOGSF - SMPEF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBBFF - SMPEF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GSTMF - SMPEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+51.72%
GRLGF - SMPEF
23%
Poorly correlated
+10.00%
NIOVF - SMPEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More