Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NINDX vs RWMFX
NINDX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts NINDX vs RWMFX
Columbia Large Cap Index Inst
Price$54.63
Change-$6.37 (-10.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.07B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.14
Change-$1.03 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.21B
NINDX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NINDX vs. RWMFX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NINDX is a Buy and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 208B vs. NINDX (3.07B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than NINDX: RWMFX (1.45) vs NINDX (1.00). NINDX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: NINDX (32 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). RWMFX (0.31) is less costly to investors than NINDX (0.20). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. NINDX (6.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than NINDX: RWMFX (250) vs NINDX (2000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.51 vs. NINDX (-8.53). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 37.79 vs. NINDX (-0.18).
| NINDX | RWMFX | NINDX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.20 | 0.31 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 32 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.110 | 1.520 | 73% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.07B | 208B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 1.45 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.53 | 5.51 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.65 | 30.53 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.18 | 37.79 | -0% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.69 | 98.02 | 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement