NILIF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
64.2M
SRCGF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NILIF vs SRCGF

Header iconNILIF vs SRCGF Comparison
Open Charts NILIF vs SRCGFBanner chart's image
Surge Battery Metals
Price$0.18
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$35.59K
Capitalization64.2M
HOMELAND NICKEL
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3.63K
Capitalization1.59M
NILIF vs SRCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NILIF vs. SRCGF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NILIF is a Hold and SRCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NILIF: $0.18 vs. SRCGF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: NILIF and SRCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NILIF: 9% vs. SRCGF: 14%
Market capitalization -- NILIF: $64.2M vs. SRCGF: $1.59M
NILIF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $64.2M. SRCGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $1.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NILIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NILIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NILIF and SRCGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NILIF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NILIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SRCGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRCGF is a better buy in the short-term than NILIF.

Price Growth

NILIF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -6.92% price change this week, while SRCGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -8.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NILIF($64.2M) has a higher market cap than SRCGF($1.59M). SRCGF YTD gains are higher at: 180.000 vs. NILIF (-28.824). SRCGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.15M vs. NILIF (-3.19M). SRCGF has more cash in the bank: 8.1M vs. NILIF (2.12M). NILIF has less debt than SRCGF: NILIF (18.4K) vs SRCGF (60K). SRCGF has higher revenues than NILIF: SRCGF (148K) vs NILIF (0).
NILIFSRCGFNILIF / SRCGF
Capitalization64.2M1.59M4,048%
EBITDA-3.19M-1.15M276%
Gain YTD-28.824180.000-16%
P/E RatioN/A0.19-
Revenue0148K-
Total Cash2.12M8.1M26%
Total Debt18.4K60K31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NILIF vs SRCGF: Fundamental Ratings
NILIF
SRCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8584
SMR RATING
1..100
9897
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NILIF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRCGF (97). This means that NILIF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRCGF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (85). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (98). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NILIF (86). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NILIF (100). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to NILIF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NILIFSRCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NILIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZLAB36.400.91
+2.56%
Zai Lab Limited
MGIC20.700.37
+1.82%
Magic Software Enterprises Ltd
CHMG50.420.52
+1.04%
Chemung Financial Corp
TRP48.150.17
+0.35%
TC Energy Corp
ONMD0.55-0.08
-12.54%
OneMedNet Corp

NILIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NILIF has been loosely correlated with LYSCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NILIF jumps, then LYSCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NILIF
1D Price
Change %
NILIF100%
-1.31%
LYSCF - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.09%
LYSDY - NILIF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
PILBF - NILIF
31%
Poorly correlated
+9.60%
PMETF - NILIF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.84%
BDNNY - NILIF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

SRCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCGF and WTRNF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCGF and WTRNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCGF
1D Price
Change %
SRCGF100%
N/A
WTRNF - SRCGF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PMYLF - SRCGF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBRF - SRCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
SXOOF - SRCGF
8%
Poorly correlated
+6.31%
NILIF - SRCGF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
More