NIJPF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
818.04M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UPMKF
Price
$26.18
Change
+$0.71 (+2.79%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Capitalization
14.83B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NIJPF vs UPMKF

Header iconNIJPF vs UPMKF Comparison
Open Charts NIJPF vs UPMKFBanner chart's image
Nippon Paper Industries
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization818.04M
UPM-Kymmene
Price$26.18
Change+$0.71 (+2.79%)
Volume$307
Capitalization14.83B
NIJPF vs UPMKF Comparison Chart in %
UPMKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIJPF vs. UPMKF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIJPF is a Hold and UPMKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (NIJPF: $6.78 vs. UPMKF: $26.18)
Brand notoriety: NIJPF and UPMKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIJPF: 100% vs. UPMKF: 4%
Market capitalization -- NIJPF: $818.04M vs. UPMKF: $14.83B
NIJPF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $818.04M. UPMKF’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $14.83B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $14.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIJPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUPMKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NIJPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UPMKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPMKF is a better buy in the long-term than NIJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

UPMKF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • UPMKF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

NIJPF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UPMKF (@Pulp & Paper) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+0.67% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPMKF($14.8B) has a higher market cap than NIJPF($818M). UPMKF has higher P/E ratio than NIJPF: UPMKF (94.38) vs NIJPF (24.79). UPMKF YTD gains are higher at: -1.661 vs. NIJPF (-14.824). NIJPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 100B vs. UPMKF (1.6B). NIJPF has more cash in the bank: 166B vs. UPMKF (740M). UPMKF has less debt than NIJPF: UPMKF (4.07B) vs NIJPF (884B). NIJPF has higher revenues than UPMKF: NIJPF (1.17T) vs UPMKF (10.2B).
NIJPFUPMKFNIJPF / UPMKF
Capitalization818M14.8B6%
EBITDA100B1.6B6,234%
Gain YTD-14.824-1.661893%
P/E Ratio24.7994.3826%
Revenue1.17T10.2B11,451%
Total Cash166B740M22,432%
Total Debt884B4.07B21,741%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
UPMKF: Fundamental Ratings
UPMKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NIJPFUPMKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
6%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
UPMKF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DFSV31.820.05
+0.16%
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
TFJL20.370.03
+0.15%
Innovator 20 Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF
EIM9.980.01
+0.10%
Eaton Vance Municipal
NBJP31.09N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Japan Equity ETF
RVNU24.82-0.02
-0.09%
Xtrackers Municipal Infras Rev Bd ETF

NIJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIJPF and UPMKF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIJPF and UPMKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIJPF
1D Price
Change %
NIJPF100%
N/A
UPMKF - NIJPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBNEF - NIJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOFF - NIJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOJF - NIJPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLMMF - NIJPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPMKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UPMKF has been loosely correlated with UPMMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UPMKF jumps, then UPMMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPMKF
1D Price
Change %
UPMKF100%
N/A
UPMMY - UPMKF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
SEOAY - UPMKF
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
MNODF - UPMKF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
SUZ - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.60%
ITP - UPMKF
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
More