NIJPF
Price
$7.96
Change
-$1.15 (-12.62%)
Updated
Mar 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.13B
SLVM
Price
$68.44
Change
+$0.07 (+0.10%)
Updated
Feb 24, 11:49 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.54B
73 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NIJPF vs SLVM

Header iconNIJPF vs SLVM Comparison
Open Charts NIJPF vs SLVMBanner chart's image
Nippon Paper Industries
Price$7.96
Change-$1.15 (-12.62%)
Volume$2.06K
Capitalization1.13B
Sylvamo
Price$68.44
Change+$0.07 (+0.10%)
Volume$100
Capitalization2.54B
NIJPF vs SLVM Comparison Chart
Loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NIJPF vs. SLVM commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NIJPF is a Hold and SLVM is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (NIJPF: $7.96 vs. SLVM: $68.37)
Brand notoriety: NIJPF and SLVM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pulp & Paper industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NIJPF: 100% vs. SLVM: 102%
Market capitalization -- NIJPF: $1.13B vs. SLVM: $2.54B
NIJPF [@Pulp & Paper] is valued at $1.13B. SLVM’s [@Pulp & Paper] market capitalization is $2.54B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pulp & Paper] industry ranges from $17.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pulp & Paper] industry is $4.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NIJPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSLVM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NIJPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SLVM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLVM is a better buy in the long-term than NIJPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SLVM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SLVM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

NIJPF (@Pulp & Paper) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SLVM (@Pulp & Paper) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pulp & Paper industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

SLVM is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pulp & Paper (+1.03% weekly)

The pulp and paper industry includes companies that make pulp and process pulp into paper and specialty paper products. Companies in this industry also operate paper mills. The industry’s products have wide array of markets including books, magazines, envelopes, containerboard, and food and beverage packaging. Domtar Corporation, Schweitzer-Mauduit International, Inc. and Neenah Inc. are some of the major pulp & paper companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLVM($2.55B) has a higher market cap than NIJPF($1.13B). NIJPF has higher P/E ratio than SLVM: NIJPF (17.39) vs SLVM (10.39). NIJPF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. SLVM (-12.985). SLVM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 572M vs. NIJPF (-9.48B). NIJPF has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. SLVM (220M). SLVM has less debt than NIJPF: SLVM (959M) vs NIJPF (896B). NIJPF has higher revenues than SLVM: NIJPF (1.12T) vs SLVM (3.72B).
NIJPFSLVMNIJPF / SLVM
Capitalization1.13B2.55B45%
EBITDA-9.48B572M-1,657%
Gain YTD0.000-12.985-
P/E Ratio17.3910.39167%
Revenue1.12T3.72B30,126%
Total Cash107B220M48,636%
Total Debt896B959M93,431%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SLVM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SLVM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

NIJPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NIJPF and SLVM have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NIJPF and SLVM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NIJPF
1D Price
Change %
NIJPF100%
N/A
SLVM - NIJPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
WBNEF - NIJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOFF - NIJPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SEOJF - NIJPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLMMF - NIJPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SLVM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLVM and MERC have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLVM and MERC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLVM
1D Price
Change %
SLVM100%
-1.85%
MERC - SLVM
31%
Poorly correlated
+16.87%
CLW - SLVM
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.37%
MONDY - SLVM
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
MAGN - SLVM
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.47%
UPMKF - SLVM
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More