Advertisement
NHPBP
Industry description
Market Cap
High and low price notable news
Volume
Fundamental Analysis Ratings
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHPBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- NHPBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHPBP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- NHPBP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
NHPBP (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +0.81% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.47%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (-0.93% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
| NHPBP | |
| Capitalization | N/A |
| EBITDA | 69.3M |
| Gain YTD | 41.615 |
| P/E Ratio | N/A |
| Revenue | 348M |
| Total Cash | N/A |
| Total Debt | 1.04B |
| NHPBP | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 47% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
NHPBP and Stocks
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPBP has been loosely correlated with NHPAP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPBP jumps, then NHPAP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPBP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPBP | 100% | +0.13% | ||
| NHPAP - NHPBP | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ALEX - NHPBP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FR - NHPBP | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.77% | ||
| UE - NHPBP | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
| BRX - NHPBP | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||