Advertisement
NHPAP vs STAG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHPAP is a Buy and STAG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHPAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NHPAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- STAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHPAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NHPAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
NHPAP (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -0.09% price change this week, while STAG (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +3.64% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was +1.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.15%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.
Reported Earning Dates
NHPAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
STAG is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (+1.62% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+1.39% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| NHPAP | STAG | NHPAP / STAG | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 7.19B | - |
| EBITDA | 92M | 674M | 14% |
| Gain YTD | 3.790 | 4.679 | 81% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.60 | - |
| Revenue | 346M | 824M | 42% |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 3.14B | 33% |
NHPAP | STAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 16 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 65 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 78 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 67 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHPAP's Valuation (4) in the null industry is in the same range as STAG (16) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
STAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (65) in the null industry. This means that STAG’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
STAG's SMR Rating (78) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that STAG’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
NHPAP's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as STAG (54) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to STAG’s over the last 12 months.
STAG's P/E Growth Rating (67) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that STAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
| NHPAP | STAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 35% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 54% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 49% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 45% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 13 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 35% |
Advertisement
NHPAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPAP has been loosely correlated with NHPBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPAP jumps, then NHPBP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPAP | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| NHPBP - NHPAP | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| EXR - NHPAP | 33% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| CUBE - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PCH - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| STAG - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.67% | ||
More | ||||
STAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STAG has been closely correlated with EGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STAG jumps, then EGP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STAG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STAG | 100% | +2.67% | ||
| EGP - STAG | 89% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| FR - STAG | 88% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| PLD - STAG | 85% Closely correlated | +1.70% | ||
| TRNO - STAG | 85% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| LXP - STAG | 82% Closely correlated | +1.21% | ||
More | ||||