Advertisement
NHPAP vs PCH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHPAP is a StrongBuy and PCH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHPAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- NHPAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PCH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHPAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NHPAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
NHPAP (@Publishing: Books/Magazines) experienced а -1.61% price change this week, while PCH (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was -3.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Publishing: Books/Magazines industry was -0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
NHPAP is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.
PCH is expected to report earnings on Feb 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Publishing: Books/Magazines (-0.52% weekly)The industry includes companies that publish and market books and magazines/periodicals. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Meredith Corporation and Scholastic Corporation are some of the biggest companies in this industry. Like many other industries, publishing companies have branched out into online/digital publications (while retaining their original print business), to capture the burgeoning market in electronic media. Business could be cyclical in certain cases, since weak consumer sentiment during an economic downturn might depress sales of some magazines and books.
@Specialty Telecommunications (+0.20% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| NHPAP | PCH | NHPAP / PCH | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 3.09B | - |
| EBITDA | 92M | 198M | 46% |
| Gain YTD | 44.639 | 5.313 | 840% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 48.80 | - |
| Revenue | 346M | 1.12B | 31% |
| Total Cash | 47.1M | 88.8M | 53% |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 1.04B | 101% |
NHPAP | PCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 62 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 38 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 64 | 75 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 46 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHPAP's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCH (38) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCH’s over the last 12 months.
NHPAP's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as PCH (75) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to PCH’s over the last 12 months.
PCH's SMR Rating (87) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that PCH’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
NHPAP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PCH (53) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to PCH’s over the last 12 months.
PCH's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that PCH’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
| NHPAP | PCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 3 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 45% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 45% | 5 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 34% | 3 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
NHPAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPAP has been loosely correlated with NHPBP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPAP jumps, then NHPBP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPAP | 100% | N/A | ||
| NHPBP - NHPAP | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| EXR - NHPAP | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| CUBE - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
| PCH - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| STAG - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
PCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCH has been closely correlated with WY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PCH jumps, then WY could also see price increases.