Advertisement
NHPAP vs PCH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHPAP is a Hold and PCH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
NHPAP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePCH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- NHPAP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PCH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
NHPAP’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PCH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- NHPAP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
NHPAP (@Managed Health Care) experienced а +0.09% price change this week, while PCH (@Specialty Telecommunications) price change was +1.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.34%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Telecommunications industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
NHPAP is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2025.
PCH is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Managed Health Care (+0.04% weekly)Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.
@Specialty Telecommunications (-1.07% weekly)Companies belonging to the specialty telecommunications sector provide voice and data transmission via a single method, such as fixed lines, digital subscriber lines (DSL), wireless technology, the internet or competitive local exchange carriers. Telefonica, Liberty Broadband Corp., and Zayo Group Holdings, Inc. are some of the big specialty telecom companies in the U.S.
| NHPAP | PCH | NHPAP / PCH | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 3.25B | - |
| EBITDA | 69.3M | 171M | 41% |
| Gain YTD | 35.880 | 10.760 | 333% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 79.42 | - |
| Revenue | 348M | 1.06B | 33% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 32.7M | - |
| Total Debt | 1.04B | 1.04B | 101% |
NHPAP | PCH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 1 Undervalued | 32 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 62 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NHPAP's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as PCH (32) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to PCH’s over the last 12 months.
PCH's Profit vs Risk Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (67) in the null industry. This means that PCH’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
PCH's SMR Rating (90) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that PCH’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
NHPAP's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as PCH (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry. This means that NHPAP’s stock grew similarly to PCH’s over the last 12 months.
PCH's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as NHPAP (100) in the null industry. This means that PCH’s stock grew similarly to NHPAP’s over the last 12 months.
| NHPAP | PCH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 43% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 40% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 4 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 39% | 4 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 45% | 12 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 46% | 8 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 48% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IRLIX | 44.74 | -0.26 | -0.58% |
| Voya Russell Large Cap Index Port A | |||
| FRDTX | 95.30 | -0.57 | -0.59% |
| Franklin Rising Dividends C | |||
| CLPYX | 58.07 | -0.37 | -0.63% |
| Columbia Large Cap Index Inst3 | |||
| ZVGIX | 61.56 | -0.46 | -0.74% |
| Zevenbergen Genea Institutional | |||
| APSDX | 17.38 | -0.17 | -0.97% |
| NYLI Fiera SMID Growth Class R6 | |||
NHPAP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHPAP has been loosely correlated with EXR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHPAP jumps, then EXR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NHPAP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NHPAP | 100% | -0.78% | ||
| EXR - NHPAP | 33% Loosely correlated | +1.88% | ||
| CUBE - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.82% | ||
| PCH - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.28% | ||
| STAG - NHPAP | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
| PSA - NHPAP | 30% Poorly correlated | +1.90% | ||
More | ||||
PCH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCH has been closely correlated with WY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PCH jumps, then WY could also see price increases.