NHOLF
Price
$32.99
Change
+$2.84 (+9.42%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
14.87B
PPCCY
Price
$51.73
Change
+$2.53 (+5.14%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NHOLF vs PPCCY

Header iconNHOLF vs PPCCY Comparison
Open Charts NHOLF vs PPCCYBanner chart's image
Sompo
Price$32.99
Change+$2.84 (+9.42%)
Volume$339
Capitalization14.87B
PICC Property and Casualty
Price$51.73
Change+$2.53 (+5.14%)
Volume$488
Capitalization25.96B
NHOLF vs PPCCY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHOLF vs. PPCCY commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHOLF is a Hold and PPCCY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NHOLF: $32.99 vs. PPCCY: $51.73)
Brand notoriety: NHOLF and PPCCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHOLF: 80% vs. PPCCY: 25%
Market capitalization -- NHOLF: $14.87B vs. PPCCY: $25.96B
NHOLF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $14.87B. PPCCY’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $25.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHOLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePPCCY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NHOLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PPCCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NHOLF and PPCCY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NHOLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PPCCY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NHOLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • PPCCY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PPCCY is a better buy in the short-term than NHOLF.

Price Growth

NHOLF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PPCCY (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +1.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+0.43% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PPCCY($26B) has a higher market cap than NHOLF($14.9B). NHOLF has higher P/E ratio than PPCCY: NHOLF (23.26) vs PPCCY (6.67). NHOLF YTD gains are higher at: 31.801 vs. PPCCY (26.665). NHOLF has higher revenues than PPCCY: NHOLF (4.49T) vs PPCCY (454B).
NHOLFPPCCYNHOLF / PPCCY
Capitalization14.9B26B57%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.80126.665119%
P/E Ratio23.266.67349%
Revenue4.49T454B990%
Total Cash1.25TN/A-
Total Debt609BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NHOLF vs PPCCY: Fundamental Ratings
NHOLF
PPCCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
43
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
185
SMR RATING
1..100
10099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
629
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PPCCY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (43). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PPCCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (18). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PPCCY's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (100). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

PPCCY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as NHOLF (44). This means that PPCCY’s stock grew similarly to NHOLF’s over the last 12 months.

NHOLF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as PPCCY (29). This means that NHOLF’s stock grew similarly to PPCCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NHOLFPPCCY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NHOLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PPCCY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JBL226.014.12
+1.86%
Jabil
CXM8.760.15
+1.74%
Sprinklr
FACT10.29N/A
N/A
Fact II Acquisition Corp
NGL4.27-0.06
-1.39%
NGL Energy Partners LP
HUSA9.42-0.88
-8.54%
Houston American Energy Corp

NHOLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHOLF and PZAKY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHOLF and PZAKY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHOLF
1D Price
Change %
NHOLF100%
N/A
PZAKY - NHOLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPCCY - NHOLF
16%
Poorly correlated
+5.14%
MSADY - NHOLF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
IAUGY - NHOLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUGF - NHOLF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PPCCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PPCCY and QBEIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PPCCY and QBEIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PPCCY
1D Price
Change %
PPCCY100%
+5.14%
QBEIF - PPCCY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHOLF - PPCCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PINXY - PPCCY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUGF - PPCCY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IAUGY - PPCCY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More