NHMAF
Price
$5.25
Change
+$1.32 (+33.59%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.87B
NZSTF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.07 (-7.45%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
238.62M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NHMAF vs NZSTF

Header iconNHMAF vs NZSTF Comparison
Open Charts NHMAF vs NZSTFBanner chart's image
Nihon M and A Center
Price$5.25
Change+$1.32 (+33.59%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.87B
NZX
Price$0.87
Change-$0.07 (-7.45%)
Volume$1.05K
Capitalization238.62M
NHMAF vs NZSTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHMAF vs. NZSTF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHMAF is a Hold and NZSTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (NHMAF: $5.25 vs. NZSTF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: NHMAF and NZSTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHMAF: 95% vs. NZSTF: 26%
Market capitalization -- NHMAF: $1.87B vs. NZSTF: $238.62M
NHMAF [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $1.87B. NZSTF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $238.62M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHMAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNZSTF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NHMAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NZSTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHMAF is a better buy in the long-term than NZSTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NHMAF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NZSTF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NHMAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NZSTF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NHMAF is a better buy in the short-term than NZSTF.

Price Growth

NHMAF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NZSTF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +114.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+6.13% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHMAF($1.87B) has a higher market cap than NZSTF($239M). NZSTF has higher P/E ratio than NHMAF: NZSTF (26.32) vs NHMAF (25.00). NHMAF YTD gains are higher at: 21.810 vs. NZSTF (-2.171). NHMAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 12.1B vs. NZSTF (35.2M). NHMAF has more cash in the bank: 44B vs. NZSTF (49.1M). NZSTF has less debt than NHMAF: NZSTF (52.5M) vs NHMAF (500M). NHMAF has higher revenues than NZSTF: NHMAF (36B) vs NZSTF (95.7M).
NHMAFNZSTFNHMAF / NZSTF
Capitalization1.87B239M781%
EBITDA12.1B35.2M34,375%
Gain YTD21.810-2.171-1,004%
P/E Ratio25.0026.3295%
Revenue36B95.7M37,618%
Total Cash44B49.1M89,613%
Total Debt500M52.5M952%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NHMAF vs NZSTF: Fundamental Ratings
NHMAF
NZSTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
3245
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4054
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6984
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a45

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NHMAF's Valuation (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (99). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

NZSTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as NHMAF (100). This means that NZSTF’s stock grew similarly to NHMAF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (45). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (54). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

NHMAF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as NZSTF (84). This means that NHMAF’s stock grew similarly to NZSTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NHMAFNZSTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
11%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NHMAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NZSTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TVFRX17.640.13
+0.74%
NAA Allocation P
BMSFX15.050.11
+0.74%
MFS Blended Research Mid Cap Eq A
SCVAX35.680.24
+0.68%
Allspring Small Company Value A
SLVCX18.470.12
+0.65%
Saratoga Large Capitalization Value C
JEMWX35.830.23
+0.65%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R6

NHMAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NHMAF and OSCUF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NHMAF and OSCUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHMAF
1D Price
Change %
NHMAF100%
N/A
OSCUF - NHMAF
11%
Poorly correlated
-14.47%
OTCM - NHMAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.70%
MCQEF - NHMAF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLNH - NHMAF
4%
Poorly correlated
+18.81%
MGHL - NHMAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NZSTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NZSTF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NZSTF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NZSTF
1D Price
Change %
NZSTF100%
N/A
SPXCY - NZSTF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
OSCUF - NZSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-14.47%
SLNH - NZSTF
9%
Poorly correlated
+18.81%
MCQEF - NZSTF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHMAF - NZSTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More