NHIC
Price
$10.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
280.55M
SZZL
Price
$10.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5, 04:54 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
315.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NHIC vs SZZL

Header iconNHIC vs SZZL Comparison
Open Charts NHIC vs SZZLBanner chart's image
Newhold Investment Corp III
Price$10.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$326.93K
Capitalization280.55M
Sizzle Acquisition Corp II
Price$10.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Capitalization315.48M
NHIC vs SZZL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NHIC vs. SZZL commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NHIC is a StrongBuy and SZZL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (NHIC: $10.16 vs. SZZL: $10.09)
Brand notoriety: NHIC and SZZL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NHIC: 1373% vs. SZZL: 206%
Market capitalization -- NHIC: $280.55M vs. SZZL: $315.48M
NHIC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $280.55M. SZZL’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $315.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $171.68M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NHIC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSZZL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NHIC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SZZL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NHIC is a better buy in the long-term than SZZL.

Price Growth

NHIC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -0.29% price change this week, while SZZL (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.78%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.01% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SZZL($315M) has a higher market cap than NHIC($281M).
NHICSZZLNHIC / SZZL
Capitalization281M315M89%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTDN/AN/A-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash1.76MN/A-
Total DebtN/A262K-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCPIX48.030.58
+1.22%
Calvert Mid-Cap I
JAVAX15.690.15
+0.97%
James Aggressive Allocation
TSOHX15.600.14
+0.91%
Nuveen International Res Eq I
PEICX22.700.15
+0.67%
PGIM Jennison Value C
FSJHX86.13N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Stock Sel M

NHIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NHIC has been loosely correlated with BAYAU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NHIC jumps, then BAYAU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NHIC
1D Price
Change %
NHIC100%
N/A
BAYAU - NHIC
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CHACU - NHIC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKLU - NHIC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLAC - NHIC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - NHIC
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SZZL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SZZL and ALF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SZZL and ALF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZZL
1D Price
Change %
SZZL100%
N/A
ALF - SZZL
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CUB - SZZL
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
NHIC - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEP - SZZL
2%
Poorly correlated
-9.54%
AACI - SZZL
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More