NGS
Price
$28.78
Change
+$0.36 (+1.27%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
360.97M
45 days until earnings call
PSYTF
Price
$8.71
Change
+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
676.83M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NGS vs PSYTF

Header iconNGS vs PSYTF Comparison
Open Charts NGS vs PSYTFBanner chart's image
Natural Gas Services Group
Price$28.78
Change+$0.36 (+1.27%)
Volume$58.14K
Capitalization360.97M
Pason Systems
Price$8.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.35%)
Volume$7.04K
Capitalization676.83M
NGS vs PSYTF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NGS vs. PSYTF commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGS is a StrongBuy and PSYTF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NGS: $28.78 vs. PSYTF: $8.71)
Brand notoriety: NGS and PSYTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NGS: 102% vs. PSYTF: 31%
Market capitalization -- NGS: $360.97M vs. PSYTF: $676.83M
NGS [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $360.97M. PSYTF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $676.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $53.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NGS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePSYTF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PSYTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NGS is a better buy in the long-term than PSYTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PSYTF’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PSYTF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PSYTF is a better buy in the short-term than NGS.

Price Growth

NGS (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +6.36% price change this week, while PSYTF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +2.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.16%.

Reported Earning Dates

NGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+2.52% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PSYTF($677M) has a higher market cap than NGS($361M). NGS has higher P/E ratio than PSYTF: NGS (20.27) vs PSYTF (13.01). NGS YTD gains are higher at: 7.836 vs. PSYTF (-7.146). PSYTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 154M vs. NGS (69.3M). PSYTF has more cash in the bank: 69.3M vs. NGS (325K). PSYTF has less debt than NGS: PSYTF (15.1M) vs NGS (182M). PSYTF has higher revenues than NGS: PSYTF (423M) vs NGS (164M).
NGSPSYTFNGS / PSYTF
Capitalization361M677M53%
EBITDA69.3M154M45%
Gain YTD7.836-7.146-110%
P/E Ratio20.2713.01156%
Revenue164M423M39%
Total Cash325K69.3M0%
Total Debt182M15.1M1,205%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NGS vs PSYTF: Fundamental Ratings
NGS
PSYTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3650
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2759
SMR RATING
1..100
7954
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PSYTF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGS (70) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGS’s over the last 12 months.

NGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PSYTF (59) in the null industry. This means that NGS’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as NGS (79) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to NGS’s over the last 12 months.

NGS's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry is in the same range as PSYTF (59) in the null industry. This means that NGS’s stock grew similarly to PSYTF’s over the last 12 months.

PSYTF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as NGS (31) in the Oilfield Services Or Equipment industry. This means that PSYTF’s stock grew similarly to NGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NGSPSYTF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PSYTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSGIX43.610.39
+0.90%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth A
JEASX17.840.11
+0.62%
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq A
OSPPX6.590.04
+0.61%
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus R6
IEOTX16.310.09
+0.55%
Voya Large Cap Growth Port S2
FRBAX30.330.14
+0.46%
JHancock Regional Bank A

NGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NGS has been closely correlated with AROC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NGS jumps, then AROC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGS
1D Price
Change %
NGS100%
+1.27%
AROC - NGS
69%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
KGS - NGS
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
OII - NGS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
BKR - NGS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.84%
PUMP - NGS
61%
Loosely correlated
+4.94%
More

PSYTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PSYTF and NGS have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PSYTF and NGS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PSYTF
1D Price
Change %
PSYTF100%
N/A
NGS - PSYTF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
SUBCY - PSYTF
17%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
SBOEY - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCCRF - PSYTF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.30%
QSEP - PSYTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-8.42%
More