Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGRDX vs RGACX
NGRDX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGRDX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R6
Price$32.76
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NGRDX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGRDX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGRDX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NGRDX (2.63B). NGRDX pays higher dividends than RGACX: NGRDX (0.24) vs RGACX (0.07). NGRDX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGRDX (6 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NGRDX (0.60). NGRDX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NGRDX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NGRDX (0) vs RGACX (250). RGACX (14.08) and NGRDX (13.80) have marching annual gain over last year. NGRDX return over 5 years is better than : 49.92 vs. RGACX (41.95).
| NGRDX | RGACX | NGRDX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.94 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.94 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.847 | 14.044 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.24 | 0.07 | 330% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.80 | 14.08 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.80 | 41.19 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.92 | 41.95 | 119% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 83.68 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement