NGLD
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
18.91M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NRRSF
Price
$0.84
Change
+$0.06 (+7.69%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
71.83M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NGLD vs NRRSF

Header iconNGLD vs NRRSF Comparison
Open Charts NGLD vs NRRSFBanner chart's image
Nevada Canyon Gold
Price$0.67
Change+$0.04 (+6.35%)
Volume$14.11K
Capitalization18.91M
Norsemont Mining
Price$0.84
Change+$0.06 (+7.69%)
Volume$107.75K
Capitalization71.83M
NGLD vs NRRSF Comparison Chart in %
NGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NRRSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NGLD vs. NRRSF commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGLD is a Hold and NRRSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (NGLD: $0.67 vs. NRRSF: $0.84)
Brand notoriety: NGLD and NRRSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NGLD: 62% vs. NRRSF: 136%
Market capitalization -- NGLD: $18.91M vs. NRRSF: $71.83M
NGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $18.91M. NRRSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $71.83M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $144.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NGLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNRRSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NGLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NRRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NRRSF is a better buy in the long-term than NGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NGLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NRRSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NGLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • NRRSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both NGLD and NRRSF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

NGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а +8.60% price change this week, while NRRSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +101.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.39% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRRSF($71.8M) has a higher market cap than NGLD($18.9M). NGLD YTD gains are higher at: 23.208 vs. NRRSF (15.903). NRRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.61M vs. NGLD (-4.12M). NGLD (6.12M) and NRRSF (5.84M) have equal amount of cash in the bank . NGLD (0) and NRRSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NGLDNRRSFNGLD / NRRSF
Capitalization18.9M71.8M26%
EBITDA-4.12M-3.61M114%
Gain YTD23.20815.903146%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.12M5.84M105%
Total DebtN/A3.05M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NGLD vs NRRSF: Fundamental Ratings
NGLD
NRRSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1123
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
43
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9786
SMR RATING
1..100
9795
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NRRSF's Valuation (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NGLD (95). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NRRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (97). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NRRSF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (97). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NRRSF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (64). This means that NRRSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as NRRSF (100). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to NRRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NGLDNRRSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NGLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NRRSF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SITE148.340.54
+0.37%
SiteOne Landscape Supply
GASS7.850.02
+0.26%
StealthGas
OAKU12.18N/A
N/A
Oak Woods Acquisition Corp
NSSC39.49N/A
N/A
NAPCO Security Technologies
TJX155.13-3.01
-1.90%
TJX Companies

NGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NGLD and NSGCF have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGLD and NSGCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGLD
1D Price
Change %
NGLD100%
+6.02%
NSGCF - NGLD
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IDR - NGLD
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
NRRSF - NGLD
-4%
Poorly correlated
+7.97%
NKOSF - NGLD
-10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NESRF - NGLD
-13%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%

NRRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NRRSF and UGDIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NRRSF and UGDIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NRRSF
1D Price
Change %
NRRSF100%
+7.97%
UGDIF - NRRSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSGCF - NRRSF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NESRF - NRRSF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.09%
IDR - NRRSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.20%
NGLD - NRRSF
-4%
Poorly correlated
+6.02%
More