NGLD
Price
$0.79
Change
-$0.01 (-1.25%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
21.11M
NKOSF
Price
$0.09
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
16.58M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NGLD vs NKOSF

Header iconNGLD vs NKOSF Comparison
Open Charts NGLD vs NKOSFBanner chart's image
Nevada Canyon Gold
Price$0.79
Change-$0.01 (-1.25%)
Volume$25.96K
Capitalization21.11M
Labrador Gold
Price$0.09
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$27.04K
Capitalization16.58M
NGLD vs NKOSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NGLD vs. NKOSF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGLD is a Hold and NKOSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (NGLD: $0.79 vs. NKOSF: $0.09)
Brand notoriety: NGLD and NKOSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NGLD: 118% vs. NKOSF: 33%
Market capitalization -- NGLD: $21.11M vs. NKOSF: $16.58M
NGLD [@Precious Metals] is valued at $21.11M. NKOSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $16.58M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $92.43B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NGLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNKOSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NGLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NKOSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, NKOSF is a better buy in the long-term than NGLD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NGLD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NKOSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NGLD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NKOSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NKOSF is a better buy in the short-term than NGLD.

Price Growth

NGLD (@Precious Metals) experienced а +3.27% price change this week, while NKOSF (@Precious Metals) price change was +2.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.65%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1000.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NGLD($21.1M) has a higher market cap than NKOSF($16.6M). NKOSF YTD gains are higher at: 110.233 vs. NGLD (6.505). NKOSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -685.27K vs. NGLD (-3.41M). NKOSF has more cash in the bank: 18M vs. NGLD (6.74M). NGLD (0) and NKOSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NGLDNKOSFNGLD / NKOSF
Capitalization21.1M16.6M127%
EBITDA-3.41M-685.27K497%
Gain YTD6.505110.2336%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash6.74M18M37%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NGLD vs NKOSF: Fundamental Ratings
NGLD
NKOSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
89100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NKOSF's Valuation (80) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (95). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (100). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (98). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

NKOSF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as NGLD (65). This means that NKOSF’s stock grew similarly to NGLD’s over the last 12 months.

NGLD's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as NKOSF (100). This means that NGLD’s stock grew similarly to NKOSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NGLDNKOSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NGLD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NKOSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRNLY1.210.06
+5.22%
The Trendlines Group Ltd.
OCPNF11.85N/A
N/A
Olympus Corp.
BPZZF15.65N/A
N/A
Boston Pizza Royalties Income Fund
MRPZF7.97N/A
N/A
Mr. Price Group Ltd.
FUNTF0.25N/A
N/A
FOUNTAINHALL CAP CORP.

NGLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NGLD and IDR have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NGLD and IDR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NGLD
1D Price
Change %
NGLD100%
-1.21%
IDR - NGLD
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
NRRSF - NGLD
-4%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%
NKOSF - NGLD
-9%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
NESRF - NGLD
-11%
Poorly correlated
+4.69%

NKOSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NKOSF and NESRF have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NKOSF and NESRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NKOSF
1D Price
Change %
NKOSF100%
+0.02%
NESRF - NKOSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.69%
IDR - NKOSF
-4%
Poorly correlated
-1.31%
NGLD - NKOSF
-9%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
NRRSF - NKOSF
-14%
Poorly correlated
+1.65%