Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDRX vs RGAGX
NGDRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$30.41
Change+$0.35 (+1.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.56B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$83.01
Change+$0.81 (+0.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets322.86B
NGDRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 323B vs. NGDRX (2.56B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGAGX (0.61) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDRX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NGDRX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. NGDRX (8.11). RGAGX (51.38) and NGDRX (50.18) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDRX | RGAGX | NGDRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.266 | 11.348 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.56B | 323B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.61 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.11 | 11.27 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.71 | 60.98 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 50.18 | 51.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.13 | 89.12 | 65% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement