Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDRX vs RGAGX
NGDRX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$31.72
Change-$0.03 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NGDRX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NGDRX (2.63B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGAGX (0.59) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDRX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGAGX: NGDRX (0) vs RGAGX (250). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. NGDRX (15.56). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. NGDRX (40.61).
| NGDRX | RGAGX | NGDRX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.30 | 430% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.887 | 16.016 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.56 | 18.90 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.35 | 61.40 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.61 | 44.13 | 92% |
| Returns for 10 years | 73.22 | 102.81 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement