Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDRX vs RGACX
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NGDRX vs RGACX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth R3
Price$33.37
Change-$0.57 (-1.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.71B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$84.05
Change-$1.88 (-2.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets340.4B
NGDRX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDRX vs. RGACX commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDRX is a StrongBuy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 340B vs. NGDRX (2.71B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NGDRX: RGACX (0.07) vs NGDRX (0.00). NGDRX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NGDRX (16 years) vs RGACX (24 years). NGDRX (1.29) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NGDRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). NGDRX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGACX: NGDRX (0) vs RGACX (250). NGDRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.65 vs. RGACX (8.31). RGACX (37.90) and NGDRX (37.62) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDRX | RGACX | NGDRX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.94 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.911 | 19.364 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.71B | 340B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.65 | 8.31 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 58.07 | 63.31 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.62 | 37.90 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.93 | 98.36 | 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement