Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDCX vs RGAGX
NGDCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$27.81
Change-$0.42 (-1.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.48B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$78.43
Change-$0.94 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
NGDCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. NGDCX (2.48B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGAGX (0.65) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGAGX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. NGDCX (5.14). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 51.11 vs. NGDCX (44.69).
| NGDCX | RGAGX | NGDCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.30 | 590% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.30 | 590% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.831 | 5.205 | 35% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.48B | 310B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.65 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.14 | 7.67 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.32 | 54.66 | 77% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.69 | 51.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 38.88 | 75.62 | 51% |