Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDCX vs RGAGX
NGDCX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDCX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth C
Price$30.49
Change+$0.28 (+0.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.49
Change+$0.20 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NGDCX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDCX vs. RGAGX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDCX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NGDCX (2.63B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDCX: RGAGX (0.59) vs NGDCX (0.00). NGDCX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDCX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDCX: RGAGX (250) vs NGDCX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.90 vs. NGDCX (14.77). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 44.13 vs. NGDCX (36.41).
| NGDCX | RGAGX | NGDCX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.30 | 590% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.30 | 590% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.534 | 16.016 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 332B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.59 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.77 | 18.90 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 46.51 | 61.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.41 | 44.13 | 83% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.19 | 102.81 | 61% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers