Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NGDAX vs RGAGX
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts NGDAX vs RGAGX
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Growth A
Price$32.22
Change-$0.04 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.63B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$85.36
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NGDAX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NGDAX vs. RGAGX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NGDAX is a StrongBuy and RGAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NGDAX (2.63B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than NGDAX: RGAGX (0.60) vs NGDAX (0.00). NGDAX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: NGDAX (16 years) vs RGAGX (16 years). NGDAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). NGDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than NGDAX: RGAGX (250) vs NGDAX (1000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. NGDAX (13.17). NGDAX (46.32) and RGAGX (46.14) have equivalent 5 years return.
| NGDAX | RGAGX | NGDAX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.30 | 340% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.449 | 14.500 | 79% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.63B | 329B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.60 | 0% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.17 | 15.11 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.61 | 43.78 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.32 | 46.14 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.18 | 90.14 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement