NG
Price
$4.23
Change
-$0.13 (-2.98%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
4 days until earnings call
SAND
Price
$6.09
Change
-$0.16 (-2.56%)
Updated
Sep 27 closing price
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

NG vs SAND

Header iconNG vs SAND Comparison
Open Charts NG vs SANDBanner chart's image
NovaGold Resources
Price$4.23
Change-$0.13 (-2.98%)
Volume$873.78K
CapitalizationN/A
Sandstorm Gold
Price$6.09
Change-$0.16 (-2.56%)
Volume$2.58M
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
NG vs SAND Comparison Chart
Loading...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
NG vs. SAND commentary
Sep 28, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NG is a Hold and SAND is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2024
Stock price -- (NG: $3.97 vs. SAND: $5.61)
Brand notoriety: NG and SAND are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NG: 87% vs. SAND: 275%
Market capitalization -- NG: $1B vs. SAND: $1.56B
NG [@Precious Metals] is valued at $1B. SAND’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.56B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $977.73M.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSAND’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SAND’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the long-term than NG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAND’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SAND’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SAND is a better buy in the short-term than NG.

Price Growth

NG (@Precious Metals) experienced а -7.24% price change this week, while SAND (@Precious Metals) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8976.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

NG is expected to report earnings on Oct 02, 2024.

SAND is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+2.37% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAND($1.56B) has a higher market cap than NG($1B). SAND YTD gains are higher at: 11.531 vs. NG (6.150). SAND has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 162M vs. NG (-33.7M). NG has more cash in the bank: 126M vs. SAND (14.8M). NG has less debt than SAND: NG (138M) vs SAND (435M). SAND has higher revenues than NG: SAND (180M) vs NG (0).
NGSANDNG / SAND
Capitalization1B1.56B64%
EBITDA-33.7M162M-21%
Gain YTD6.15011.53153%
P/E RatioN/A37.43-
Revenue0180M-
Total Cash126M14.8M851%
Total Debt138M435M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NG vs SAND: Fundamental Ratings
NG
SAND
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
95
Overvalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3751
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10022
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SAND's Valuation (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (95) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's SMR Rating (87) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew similarly to NG’s over the last 12 months.

NG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SAND (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that NG’s stock grew similarly to SAND’s over the last 12 months.

SAND's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for NG (100) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SAND’s stock grew significantly faster than NG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NGSAND
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 2 months ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
0%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
NG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
SAND
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME23.14-0.28
-1.20%
GameStop Corp
TSLA210.60-3.51
-1.64%
Tesla
SPY552.08-11.60
-2.06%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
AAPL222.77-6.23
-2.72%
Apple
BTC.X57431.023000-1681.457000
-2.84%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

NG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NG has been loosely correlated with MAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NG jumps, then MAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NG
1D Price
Change %
NG100%
-6.59%
MAG - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
-6.67%
SAND - NG
63%
Loosely correlated
-4.27%
HL - NG
62%
Loosely correlated
-9.11%
AEM - NG
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.02%
KGC - NG
59%
Loosely correlated
-4.87%
More

SAND and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAND has been closely correlated with RGLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAND jumps, then RGLD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAND
1D Price
Change %
SAND100%
-4.27%
RGLD - SAND
81%
Closely correlated
-3.62%
AEM - SAND
81%
Closely correlated
-3.02%
MAG - SAND
80%
Closely correlated
-6.67%
KGC - SAND
78%
Closely correlated
-4.87%
AGI - SAND
77%
Closely correlated
-4.30%
More