Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFRA vs OBOR
NFRA vs OBOR Comparison
Open Charts NFRA vs OBOR
FlexShares STOXX Global Broad Infras ETF
Price$61.27
Change+$0.12 (+0.20%)
Volume$180K
Net Assets2.72B
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road ETF
Price$23.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$121
Net Assets3.53M
NFRA vs OBOR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFRA vs. OBOR commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFRA is a Buy and OBOR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFRA has more net assets: 2.72B vs. OBOR (3.53M). NFRA has a higher annual dividend yield than OBOR: NFRA (14.290) vs OBOR (11.074). NFRA was incepted earlier than OBOR: NFRA (12 years) vs OBOR (8 years). NFRA (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than OBOR (0.79). OBOR has a higher turnover NFRA (12.00) vs NFRA (12.00).
| NFRA | OBOR | NFRA / OBOR | |
| Gain YTD | 14.290 | 11.074 | 129% |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 3.53M | 77,255% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.79 | 59% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 27.00 | 44% |
| Yield | 2.97 | 3.59 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 8 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| NFRA | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 76% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
NFRA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFRA has been closely correlated with AWK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NFRA jumps, then AWK could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NFRA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NFRA | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| AWK - NFRA | 71% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| DTE - NFRA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.05% | ||
| SRE - NFRA | 68% Closely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| EIX - NFRA | 67% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| PPL - NFRA | 67% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
OBOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that OBOR and ZIM have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that OBOR and ZIM's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OBOR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OBOR | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZIM - OBOR | 18% Poorly correlated | +5.49% | ||
| AC - OBOR | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| ICL - OBOR | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.59% | ||
| ESLT - OBOR | -0% Poorly correlated | +0.60% |