NFPDF
Price
$20.00
Change
-$0.14 (-0.70%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
8.64B
ORKLF
Price
$10.64
Change
+$0.38 (+3.70%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
7.87B
Interact to see
Advertisement

NFPDF vs ORKLF

Header iconNFPDF vs ORKLF Comparison
Open Charts NFPDF vs ORKLFBanner chart's image
Nissin Food Products
Price$20.00
Change-$0.14 (-0.70%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization8.64B
Orkla ASA
Price$10.64
Change+$0.38 (+3.70%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization7.87B
NFPDF vs ORKLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFPDF vs. ORKLF commentary
Jun 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFPDF is a Hold and ORKLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 28, 2025
Stock price -- (NFPDF: $20.00 vs. ORKLF: $10.64)
Brand notoriety: NFPDF and ORKLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFPDF: 122% vs. ORKLF: 21%
Market capitalization -- NFPDF: $8.64B vs. ORKLF: $7.87B
NFPDF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $8.64B. ORKLF’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $7.87B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.42B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFPDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileORKLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NFPDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ORKLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ORKLF is a better buy in the long-term than NFPDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFPDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ORKLF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFPDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ORKLF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ORKLF is a better buy in the short-term than NFPDF.

Price Growth

NFPDF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -0.70% price change this week, while ORKLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +3.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.17%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.38% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NFPDF($8.64B) has a higher market cap than ORKLF($7.87B). NFPDF has higher P/E ratio than ORKLF: NFPDF (27.70) vs ORKLF (15.27). ORKLF YTD gains are higher at: 19.795 vs. NFPDF (-24.528). NFPDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 85.1B vs. ORKLF (10.7B). NFPDF has more cash in the bank: 89.1B vs. ORKLF (2.51B). ORKLF has less debt than NFPDF: ORKLF (24.3B) vs NFPDF (41.1B). NFPDF has higher revenues than ORKLF: NFPDF (646B) vs ORKLF (64.1B).
NFPDFORKLFNFPDF / ORKLF
Capitalization8.64B7.87B110%
EBITDA85.1B10.7B795%
Gain YTD-24.52819.795-124%
P/E Ratio27.7015.27181%
Revenue646B64.1B1,008%
Total Cash89.1B2.51B3,546%
Total Debt41.1B24.3B169%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NFPDF vs ORKLF: Fundamental Ratings
NFPDF
ORKLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8247
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9047
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ORKLF's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as NFPDF (47). This means that ORKLF’s stock grew similarly to NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (100). This means that ORKLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

NFPDF's SMR Rating (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ORKLF (99). This means that NFPDF’s stock grew significantly faster than ORKLF’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (82). This means that ORKLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

ORKLF's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFPDF (90). This means that ORKLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFPDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFPDFORKLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NFPDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ORKLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLSW37.770.26
+0.70%
Franklin FTSE Switzerland ETF
QUAL181.591.22
+0.68%
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
LUX21.86N/A
N/A
Tema Luxury ETF
IWC127.59-0.01
-0.01%
iShares Micro-Cap ETF
EVSB50.97-0.01
-0.02%
Eaton Vance Ultra-Short Income ETF

NFPDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFPDF and ARRT have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFPDF and ARRT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFPDF
1D Price
Change %
NFPDF100%
N/A
ARRT - NFPDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAMA - NFPDF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
NCRA - NFPDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LYSFY - NFPDF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MRRTY - NFPDF
2%
Poorly correlated
-7.40%
More

ORKLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ORKLF and FNEVY have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ORKLF and FNEVY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ORKLF
1D Price
Change %
ORKLF100%
N/A
FNEVY - ORKLF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELV - ORKLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-12.24%
ORKLY - ORKLF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
NSRGY - ORKLF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.20%
NFPDF - ORKLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More