NFLDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
Capitalization
8.56M
TAJIF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Updated
Oct 9 closing price
Capitalization
20.67M
Interact to see
Advertisement

NFLDF vs TAJIF

Header iconNFLDF vs TAJIF Comparison
Open Charts NFLDF vs TAJIFBanner chart's image
Exploits Discovery
Price$0.04
Change-$0.01 (-20.00%)
Volume$425.4K
Capitalization8.56M
Tajiri Resources
Price$0.12
Change+$0.01 (+9.09%)
Volume$10.2K
Capitalization20.67M
NFLDF vs TAJIF Comparison Chart in %
NFLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFLDF vs. TAJIF commentary
Oct 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFLDF is a Hold and TAJIF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 19, 2025
Stock price -- (NFLDF: $0.04 vs. TAJIF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: NFLDF and TAJIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFLDF: 124% vs. TAJIF: 78%
Market capitalization -- NFLDF: $8.56M vs. TAJIF: $20.67M
NFLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.56M. TAJIF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $20.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTAJIF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • NFLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TAJIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both NFLDF and TAJIF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFLDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TAJIF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFLDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TAJIF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TAJIF is a better buy in the short-term than NFLDF.

Price Growth

NFLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -6.93% price change this week, while TAJIF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +0.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1194.07%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+0.57% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAJIF($20.7M) has a higher market cap than NFLDF($8.56M). TAJIF YTD gains are higher at: 172.727 vs. NFLDF (50.887). TAJIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.11M vs. NFLDF (-3.67M). NFLDF has more cash in the bank: 3.58M vs. TAJIF (112K). NFLDF (0) and TAJIF (0) have equivalent revenues.
NFLDFTAJIFNFLDF / TAJIF
Capitalization8.56M20.7M41%
EBITDA-3.67M-1.11M331%
Gain YTD50.887172.72729%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash3.58M112K3,197%
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFLDFTAJIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NFLDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TAJIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VALE11.10-0.01
-0.09%
Vale SA
AB39.21-0.44
-1.11%
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
IRMD73.43-2.62
-3.45%
iRadimed Corp
SAVA4.30-0.22
-4.87%
Cassava Sciences
BQ7.83-0.86
-9.90%
Boqii Holding Limited

NFLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFLDF and WDOFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFLDF and WDOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFLDF
1D Price
Change %
NFLDF100%
-3.05%
WDOFF - NFLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-7.25%
PAAS - NFLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-8.54%
DTARF - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
HYMC - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-11.76%
CDE - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-8.87%
More

TAJIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAJIF has been loosely correlated with MRIRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TAJIF jumps, then MRIRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TAJIF
1D Price
Change %
TAJIF100%
N/A
MRIRF - TAJIF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
SKHRF - TAJIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-5.92%
GUYGF - TAJIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.10%
NFLDF - TAJIF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.05%
RYES - TAJIF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+19.39%