NFLDF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.94M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PAAS
Price
$44.19
Change
-$0.25 (-0.56%)
Updated
Dec 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
18.72B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NFLDF vs PAAS

Header iconNFLDF vs PAAS Comparison
Open Charts NFLDF vs PAASBanner chart's image
Exploits Discovery
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$114.11K
Capitalization7.94M
Pan American Silver
Price$44.19
Change-$0.25 (-0.56%)
Volume$35.33K
Capitalization18.72B
NFLDF vs PAAS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFLDF vs. PAAS commentary
Dec 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFLDF is a Buy and PAAS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 05, 2025
Stock price -- (NFLDF: $0.04 vs. PAAS: $44.44)
Brand notoriety: NFLDF: Not notable vs. PAAS: Notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFLDF: 58% vs. PAAS: 67%
Market capitalization -- NFLDF: $7.94M vs. PAAS: $18.72B
NFLDF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.94M. PAAS’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $18.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $112.48B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAAS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NFLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAAS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the long-term than NFLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFLDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAAS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFLDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PAAS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAAS is a better buy in the short-term than NFLDF.

Price Growth

NFLDF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +1.15% price change this week, while PAAS (@Precious Metals) price change was +4.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +5.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +63.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAAS is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+5.15% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAAS($18.7B) has a higher market cap than NFLDF($7.94M). PAAS YTD gains are higher at: 122.506 vs. NFLDF (49.488). PAAS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.41B vs. NFLDF (-3.67M). PAAS has more cash in the bank: 1.11B vs. NFLDF (3.58M). PAAS has higher revenues than NFLDF: PAAS (3.12B) vs NFLDF (0).
NFLDFPAASNFLDF / PAAS
Capitalization7.94M18.7B0%
EBITDA-3.67M1.41B-0%
Gain YTD49.488122.50640%
P/E RatioN/A25.69-
Revenue03.12B-
Total Cash3.58M1.11B0%
Total DebtN/A821M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAAS: Fundamental Ratings
PAAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
30
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
66
SMR RATING
1..100
67
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFLDFPAAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NFLDF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PAAS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CVNY37.400.74
+2.02%
YieldMax CVNA Option Income Strategy ETF
NULV45.660.43
+0.95%
Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF
BBLU15.430.10
+0.65%
EA Bridgeway Blue Chip ETF
EFRA33.94N/A
N/A
iShares Environmental Infras & IndstrETF
UJUN37.10-0.01
-0.03%
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Jun

NFLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NFLDF and WDOFF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NFLDF and WDOFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFLDF
1D Price
Change %
NFLDF100%
+1.86%
WDOFF - NFLDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
PAAS - NFLDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
DTARF - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.89%
HYMC - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
CDE - NFLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
More

PAAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAAS has been closely correlated with WPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAAS jumps, then WPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAAS
1D Price
Change %
PAAS100%
-0.91%
WPM - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
+0.21%
AEM - PAAS
81%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
KGC - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
-1.31%
CGAU - PAAS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
IAG - PAAS
78%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More