NFG
Price
$93.72
Change
+$1.16 (+1.25%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
8.47B
32 days until earnings call
SU
Price
$42.62
Change
-$0.08 (-0.19%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
51.68B
31 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NFG vs SU

Header iconNFG vs SU Comparison
Open Charts NFG vs SUBanner chart's image
National Fuel Gas
Price$93.72
Change+$1.16 (+1.25%)
Volume$516.57K
Capitalization8.47B
Suncor Energy
Price$42.62
Change-$0.08 (-0.19%)
Volume$2.1M
Capitalization51.68B
NFG vs SU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NFG vs. SU commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFG is a StrongBuy and SU is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (NFG: $93.72 vs. SU: $42.62)
Brand notoriety: NFG: Not notable vs. SU: Notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NFG: 90% vs. SU: 53%
Market capitalization -- NFG: $8.47B vs. SU: $51.68B
NFG [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $8.47B. SU’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $51.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $499.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $57.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NFG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSU’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • NFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SU’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SU is a better buy in the long-term than NFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SU’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SU’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NFG is a better buy in the short-term than SU.

Price Growth

NFG (@Integrated Oil) experienced а +8.36% price change this week, while SU (@Integrated Oil) price change was +2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

NFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

SU is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+1.68% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SU($51.7B) has a higher market cap than NFG($8.47B). NFG has higher P/E ratio than SU: NFG (34.71) vs SU (13.05). NFG YTD gains are higher at: 56.451 vs. SU (19.451). SU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.2B vs. NFG (918M). SU has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. NFG (39.3M). NFG has less debt than SU: NFG (2.74B) vs SU (14.3B). SU has higher revenues than NFG: SU (53.6B) vs NFG (2.18B).
NFGSUNFG / SU
Capitalization8.47B51.7B16%
EBITDA918M15.2B6%
Gain YTD56.45119.451290%
P/E Ratio34.7113.05266%
Revenue2.18B53.6B4%
Total Cash39.3M2.27B2%
Total Debt2.74B14.3B19%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NFG vs SU: Fundamental Ratings
NFG
SU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3217
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1828
SMR RATING
1..100
7761
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
913
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
14n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SU's Valuation (30) in the Integrated Oil industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NFG (74). This means that SU’s stock grew somewhat faster than NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (28). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

SU's SMR Rating (61) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as NFG (77). This means that SU’s stock grew similarly to NFG’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (48). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

NFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Integrated Oil industry is in the same range as SU (13). This means that NFG’s stock grew similarly to SU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NFGSU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IYW194.050.57
+0.29%
iShares US Technology ETF
PJUN41.030.04
+0.10%
Innovator U.S. Equity Power BffrETF™-Jun
DVND35.07N/A
N/A
Touchstone Dividend Select ETF
SCEC25.45-0.01
-0.04%
Sterling Capital Enhanced Core Bond ETF
BSL14.02-0.04
-0.28%
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund

NFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NFG has been loosely correlated with SHEL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NFG jumps, then SHEL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NFG
1D Price
Change %
NFG100%
+1.25%
SHEL - NFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
E - NFG
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
CVX - NFG
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
XOM - NFG
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
SU - NFG
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
More

SU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SU has been closely correlated with CVE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SU jumps, then CVE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SU
1D Price
Change %
SU100%
-0.19%
CVE - SU
81%
Closely correlated
+0.40%
IMO - SU
79%
Closely correlated
-0.12%
SHEL - SU
78%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
XOM - SU
77%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
CVX - SU
76%
Closely correlated
-0.35%
More