Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGEBX
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGEBX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$20.02
Change-$0.90 (-4.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.18B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets306.22B
NFEPX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 306B vs. NFEPX (1.18B). NFEPX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NFEPX (27 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RGEBX (1.09) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.88). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGEBX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. NFEPX (2.77). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. NFEPX (-7.27).
| NFEPX | RGEBX | NFEPX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 1.09 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.88 | 1.09 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.145 | 4.829 | -65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.18B | 306B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.77 | 7.68 | 36% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.41 | 51.01 | 58% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.27 | 45.42 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | -5.92 | 65.87 | -9% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement