Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGACX
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$22.02
Change-$0.02 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.3B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NFEPX (1.3B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGACX (0.07) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGACX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). RGACX (17.83) and NFEPX (17.50) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. NFEPX (-9.35).
| NFEPX | RGACX | NFEPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.531 | 15.516 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.3B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.50 | 17.83 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 64.08 | 58.53 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | -9.35 | 40.02 | -23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.68 | 95.93 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement