Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEPX vs RGACX
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEPX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp Inst
Price$21.94
Change-$0.03 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$82.10
Change-$0.06 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets329.22B
NFEPX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEPX vs. RGACX commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEPX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 329B vs. NFEPX (1.31B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NFEPX: RGACX (0.07) vs NFEPX (0.00). NFEPX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEPX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RGACX (0.94) is less costly to investors than NFEPX (0.86). NFEPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEPX: RGACX (250) vs NFEPX (2000). NFEPX (14.21) and RGACX (14.08) have marching annual gain over last year. RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 41.95 vs. NFEPX (-6.76).
| NFEPX | RGACX | NFEPX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.94 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.94 | 91% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.144 | 14.044 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 329B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.21 | 14.08 | 101% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.68 | 41.19 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.76 | 41.95 | -16% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.71 | 83.68 | 8% |