Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEAX vs VIGRX
NFEAX vs VIGRX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs VIGRX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp A
Price$17.71
Change-$0.08 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Vanguard Growth Index Investor
Price$233.57
Change-$1.17 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets311.95B
NFEAX vs VIGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. VIGRX commentary
Jul 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and VIGRX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VIGRX has more cash in the bank: 312B vs. NFEAX (1.31B). VIGRX pays higher dividends than NFEAX: VIGRX (0.34) vs NFEAX (0.00). NFEAX was incepted earlier than VIGRX: NFEAX (28 years) vs VIGRX (33 years). NFEAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than VIGRX (0.17). NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. VIGRX (11.00). NFEAX has a lower initial minimum investment than VIGRX: NFEAX (2000) vs VIGRX (3000). VIGRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.08 vs. NFEAX (15.30). VIGRX return over 5 years is better than : 111.99 vs. NFEAX (-13.14).
| NFEAX | VIGRX | NFEAX / VIGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.17 | 618% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.17 | 653% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.299 | 10.545 | 41% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 3000 | 67% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 312B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.34 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.30 | 25.08 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 48.32 | 80.05 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | -13.14 | 111.99 | -12% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.01 | 312.28 | -4% |