Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEAX vs RGEBX
NFEAX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs RGEBX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp A
Price$16.32
Change-$0.85 (-4.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.24B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$74.89
Change-$0.91 (-1.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets309.97B
NFEAX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. RGEBX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 310B vs. NFEAX (1.24B). NFEAX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . NFEAX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: NFEAX (27 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). NFEAX (1.13) and RGEBX (1.09) have similar cost to investors . NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGEBX (25.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEAX: RGEBX (250) vs NFEAX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. NFEAX (1.18). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.42 vs. NFEAX (-16.99).
| NFEAX | RGEBX | NFEAX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.09 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.13 | 1.09 | 104% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.887 | 4.829 | -80% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 310B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.18 | 7.68 | 15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.71 | 51.01 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.99 | 45.42 | -37% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.76 | 65.87 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement