Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFEAX vs RGACX
NFEAX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts NFEAX vs RGACX
Columbia Large Cap Growth Opp A
Price$18.08
Change+$0.14 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.62
Change+$0.46 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
NFEAX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFEAX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFEAX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. NFEAX (1.31B). RGACX pays higher dividends than NFEAX: RGACX (0.07) vs NFEAX (0.00). NFEAX was incepted earlier than RGACX: NFEAX (28 years) vs RGACX (23 years). NFEAX (1.11) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). NFEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFEAX: RGACX (250) vs NFEAX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.05 vs. NFEAX (19.81). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 42.51 vs. NFEAX (-16.61).
| NFEAX | RGACX | NFEAX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 0.94 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 0.94 | 118% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.478 | 16.155 | 40% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.81 | 21.05 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.74 | 51.55 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.61 | 42.51 | -39% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.64 | 97.10 | -3% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement