Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFACX vs RPEBX
NFACX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFACX vs RPEBX
Neuberger Berman Focus C
Price$32.55
Change+$0.29 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets791.68M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$68.03
Change+$0.38 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets156.22B
NFACX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFACX vs. RPEBX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFACX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. NFACX (792M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than NFACX: RPEBX (0.12) vs NFACX (0.00). NFACX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: NFACX (15 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). NFACX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RPEBX (1.21). NFACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFACX: RPEBX (250) vs NFACX (1000). NFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.49 vs. RPEBX (10.62). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 42.79 vs. NFACX (27.20).
| NFACX | RPEBX | NFACX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.87 | 1.21 | 155% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.21 | 162% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.613 | 12.688 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 792M | 156B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.49 | 10.62 | 174% |
| Returns for 3 years | 66.24 | 44.60 | 149% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.20 | 42.79 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | -40.54 | 80.13 | -51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement