Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFAAX vs RPEBX
NFAAX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFAAX vs RPEBX
Neuberger Berman Focus A
Price$36.60
Change+$0.20 (+0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets816.2M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$72.81
Change+$0.24 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.64B
NFAAX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFAAX vs. RPEBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFAAX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. NFAAX (816M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than NFAAX: RPEBX (0.12) vs NFAAX (0.00). NFAAX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: NFAAX (15 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NFAAX (1.14). NFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFAAX: RPEBX (250) vs NFAAX (1000). NFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.33 vs. RPEBX (11.71). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 23.04 vs. NFAAX (20.73).
| NFAAX | RPEBX | NFAAX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.21 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.261 | 20.209 | 100% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 816M | 163B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.33 | 11.71 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.23 | 48.21 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.73 | 23.04 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.77 | 95.29 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers