Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NFAAX vs RPEBX
NFAAX vs RPEBX Comparison
Open Charts NFAAX vs RPEBX
Neuberger Berman Focus A
Price$34.94
Change+$0.08 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets837.04M
American Funds New Perspective R2E
Price$69.03
Change+$0.06 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.35B
NFAAX vs RPEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NFAAX vs. RPEBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NFAAX is a Buy and RPEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RPEBX has more cash in the bank: 158B vs. NFAAX (837M). RPEBX pays higher dividends than NFAAX: RPEBX (0.12) vs NFAAX (0.00). NFAAX was incepted earlier than RPEBX: NFAAX (15 years) vs RPEBX (11 years). RPEBX (1.21) is less costly to investors than NFAAX (1.14). NFAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RPEBX (24.00). RPEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than NFAAX: RPEBX (250) vs NFAAX (1000). NFAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.96 vs. RPEBX (16.37). RPEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.67 vs. NFAAX (31.42).
| NFAAX | RPEBX | NFAAX / RPEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.12 | 1.21 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 1.21 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.849 | 14.345 | 110% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 837M | 158B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.12 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.96 | 16.37 | 159% |
| Returns for 3 years | 70.52 | 43.39 | 163% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.42 | 39.67 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.55 | 79.94 | 16% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement