Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NEXIX vs TRQZX
NEXIX vs TRQZX Comparison
Open Charts NEXIX vs TRQZX
Shelton Sustainable Equity Institutional
Price$37.20
Change+$0.70 (+1.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets73.05M
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Growth Z
Price$98.26
Change-$6.13 (-5.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets25.1B
NEXIX vs TRQZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NEXIX vs. TRQZX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NEXIX is a Buy and TRQZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRQZX has more cash in the bank: 25.1B vs. NEXIX (73.1M). TRQZX pays higher dividends than NEXIX: TRQZX (0.74) vs NEXIX (0.42). NEXIX was incepted earlier than TRQZX: NEXIX (3 years) vs TRQZX (6 years). NEXIX (1.01) is less costly to investors than TRQZX (0.61). TRQZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.60 vs. NEXIX (21.00). TRQZX has a lower initial minimum investment than NEXIX: TRQZX (0) vs NEXIX (1000). NEXIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.80 vs. TRQZX (-5.09). TRQZX return over 5 years is better than : -13.86 vs. NEXIX (-21.87).
| NEXIX | TRQZX | NEXIX / TRQZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.00 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 0.61 | 166% |
| Fund Existence | 3 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.963 | -0.061 | -14,688% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 73.1M | 25.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.42 | 0.74 | 57% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.80 | -5.09 | -389% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.31 | 2.38 | 518% |
| Returns for 5 years | -21.87 | -13.86 | 158% |
| Returns for 10 years | 200.03 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement