NET
Price
$197.79
Change
+$0.44 (+0.22%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
32.7B
10 days until earnings call
TTWO
Price
$231.35
Change
+$0.17 (+0.07%)
Updated
Jul 21, 04:48 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
25.33B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

NET vs TTWO

Header iconNET vs TTWO Comparison
Open Charts NET vs TTWOBanner chart's image
Cloudflare
Price$197.79
Change+$0.44 (+0.22%)
Volume$500
Capitalization32.7B
Take-Two Interactive Software
Price$231.35
Change+$0.17 (+0.07%)
Volume$1.57K
Capitalization25.33B
NET vs TTWO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
NET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NET vs. TTWO commentary
Jul 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NET is a Hold and TTWO is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 21, 2025
Stock price -- (NET: $197.35 vs. TTWO: $231.18)
Brand notoriety: NET: Not notable vs. TTWO: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NET: 127% vs. TTWO: 143%
Market capitalization -- NET: $32.7B vs. TTWO: $25.33B
NET [@Packaged Software] is valued at $32.7B. TTWO’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $25.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NET’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTTWO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • NET’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TTWO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the long-term than NET.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NET’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTWO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NET’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTWO is a better buy in the short-term than NET.

Price Growth

NET (@Packaged Software) experienced а +8.80% price change this week, while TTWO (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

NET is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

TTWO is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.68% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NET($32.7B) has a higher market cap than TTWO($25.3B). NET YTD gains are higher at: 83.275 vs. TTWO (25.587). TTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 561M vs. NET (-36.17M). NET has more cash in the bank: 1.67B vs. TTWO (922M). NET has less debt than TTWO: NET (1.44B) vs TTWO (3.53B). TTWO has higher revenues than NET: TTWO (5.4B) vs NET (1.3B).
NETTTWONET / TTWO
Capitalization32.7B25.3B129%
EBITDA-36.17M561M-6%
Gain YTD83.27525.587325%
P/E RatioN/A61.73-
Revenue1.3B5.4B24%
Total Cash1.67B922M182%
Total Debt1.44B3.53B41%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NET vs TTWO: Fundamental Ratings
NET
TTWO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4552
SMR RATING
1..100
9298
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3646
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10014
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTWO's Valuation (83) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as NET (85) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew similarly to NET’s over the last 12 months.

NET's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (52) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

NET's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (98) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

NET's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TTWO (46) in the Recreational Products industry. This means that NET’s stock grew similarly to TTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TTWO's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is significantly better than the same rating for NET (100) in the null industry. This means that TTWO’s stock grew significantly faster than NET’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NETTTWO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALAI31.730.34
+1.08%
Alger AI Enablers & Adopters ETF
XLRE41.840.12
+0.29%
The Real Estate Select Sector SPDR®
NUSA23.270.03
+0.13%
Nuveen ESG 1-5 Year US Aggt Bd ETF
GSSC69.50-0.43
-0.61%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
MGMT40.56-0.31
-0.76%
Ballast Small/Mid Cap ETF

NET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NET has been loosely correlated with MDB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NET jumps, then MDB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NET
1D Price
Change %
NET100%
+3.19%
MDB - NET
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
NOW - NET
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
SNOW - NET
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.51%
HUBS - NET
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.61%
CRWD - NET
60%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More

TTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTWO has been loosely correlated with NET. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTWO jumps, then NET could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTWO
1D Price
Change %
TTWO100%
-3.16%
NET - TTWO
50%
Loosely correlated
+3.19%
PANW - TTWO
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.25%
DOCS - TTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
SSNC - TTWO
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
GDDY - TTWO
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.26%
More