Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
NESIX vs WCMLX
NESIX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts NESIX vs WCMLX
Needham Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$21.55
Change+$0.35 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets147.57M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.06
Change+$0.20 (+1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets44.36M
NESIX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
NESIX vs. WCMLX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NESIX is a Buy and WCMLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NESIX has more cash in the bank: 148M vs. WCMLX (44.4M). NESIX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . NESIX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: NESIX (9 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than NESIX (1.51). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. NESIX (62.00). NESIX (100000) and WCMLX (100000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NESIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.71 vs. WCMLX (-1.14). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. NESIX (-12.40).
| NESIX | WCMLX | NESIX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.99 | 120% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.51 | 1.79 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.560 | 7.621 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 100000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 148M | 44.4M | 333% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.71 | -1.14 | -237% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.22 | 21.83 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | -12.40 | 1.99 | -623% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement